•  
     
     
     
     
     
     

    【JFE】再论联动性

    [发布日期]:2016-10-08  [浏览次数]:

    Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 121, Issue 3, September 2016, Pages 624-644

    再论联动性

    作者:Honghui Chen (University of Central Florida-College of Business Administration), Vijay Singal (Pamplin College of Business), Robert F. Whitelaw (New York University-Stern School of Business; NBER)

    摘要:指数成分股增加(Barberis, Shleifer, and Wurgler, 2005)和股票拆分(Green and Hwang, 2009)带来的股价超额联动对传统金融理论造成了挑战🙋🏼‍♀️🤶🏻。我们发现这类文献中没有对超额联动提供经济学上的解释🙆🏿,并且双变量的回归系数对不相关因素的变化敏感✥。在使用了稳健的单变量回归并且控制对照组之后,几乎所有关于超额联动的证据都消失了🧝🏽‍♀️🤹🏿‍♀️。在这两个例子中,股票都在事件发生前呈现出了高额回报🙎🏻,类似于动量理论中的赢者组合🥨。我们证明了赢者股票的贝塔值在增加,由此带来了明显的超额联动。

    关键词🤺🛂:市场效率,非基本联动🏄🏼,对资产类别的需求,随时间变化的贝塔

    Comovement revisited

    Honghui Chen (University of Central Florida-College of Business Administration), Vijay Singal (Pamplin College of Business), Robert F. Whitelaw (New York University-Stern School of Business; NBER)

    ABSTRACT

    Evidence of excessive comovement among stocks following index additions (Barberis, Shleifer, and Wurgler, 2005) and stock splits (Green and Hwang, 2009) challenges traditional finance theory. We show that the bivariate regressions in this literature provide little information about the economic magnitude of excess comovement, with coefficients that are sensitive to unrelated factors. Using robust univariate regressions and matched control samples, almost all evidence of excess comovement disappears. In both examples, the stocks exhibit strong returns prior to the event, akin to momentum winners. We document that winner stocks exhibit increases in betas, generating much of the apparent excess comovement.

    原文链接:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.05.007

    翻译⚉:吴雨玲



    上一条:【RFS】个人投资者把交易当作一项有趣和刺激的赌博活动了吗?来自重复自然实验的证据 下一条:【JEF】金融泡沫风险下的资产定价

    关闭

     
    凯发平台专业提供👆🏼:凯发平台凯发娱乐凯发开户等服务,提供最新官网平台、地址、注册、登陆、登录、入口、全站、网站、网页、网址、娱乐、手机版、app、下载、欧洲杯、欧冠、nba、世界杯、英超等,界面美观优质完美,安全稳定,服务一流🐈,凯发平台欢迎您。 凯发平台官网xml地图
    凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台 凯发平台